<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dr David Duckworth's Articles and Publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A retrospective review of Plate v’s Intramedullary Fixation. David Duckworth, Deborah Hermans RN</title>
		<link>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=23</link>
		<comments>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction :
It is now generally accepted that displaced midshaft clavicle fractures benefit from internal fixation. Plating and intramedullary fixation have become the accepted methods of fixation.  The purpose of this study was to see if one method of fixation of clavicle fractures has a lower complication rate and higher union rate compared to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Introduction :</h2>
<p>It is now generally accepted that displaced midshaft clavicle fractures benefit from internal fixation. Plating and intramedullary fixation have become the accepted methods of fixation.  The purpose of this study was to see if one method of fixation of clavicle fractures has a lower complication rate and higher union rate compared to the other.</p>
<h2>Materials and Methods:</h2>
<p>Over the last 9 years the senior author internally fixed 430 midshaft clavicle fractures. 255 of these were with intramedullary fixation using a Rockwood pin and 175 were with plate fixation ranging from a DCP plate to an anatomical plate. All patients were assessed until union looking at scarring and paraesthesia, range of motion, function, and return to normal activity. Any complications were documented and the 2 methods were compared.</p>
<h2>Results:</h2>
<p>All fractures eventually healed.  The intramedullary pins had the higher complication rate. 2 of the pins had a deep infection requiring removal and eventual plate fixation. Other complications included 5 cases of capsulitis, 3 cases of refracture after removal of the pin, non-union requiring revision plating 15/255(6%), and a 10% incidence of irritation from the end of the pin.                                            Of those with plate fixation there were 2 non unions out of 175(1%). There was one bent plate 5 weeks post-op due to football requiring revision plating surgery. There were 2 plates with some backing out of screws and mild plate elevation laterally. Both united with conservative management and no loss of function. There were no deep infections.                                                                      Patients with plate fixation regained range of motion quicker and earlier normal function compared to the pins.</p>
<h2>Conclusion:</h2>
<p>Both methods of fixation had a high union rate with plate fixation showing a statistically significant lower rate of non union compared to pinning. The overall complication rate was higher with intramedullary fixation. Plate fixation provided an earlier return to normal function, range of motion and a more predictable result. Plate fixation was possible with all forms of clavicle fractures whereas intramedullary fixation was limited in comminuted fractures, small clavicle canals and osteoporotic bone. This series and patient feedback has changed the way I manage clavicle fractures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=23</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osteotomy and Internal Fixation of the Radial Head to correct a Malunion or Nonunion post Mason Type 11 Fractures: Clinical Outcome in 33 Cases.”</title>
		<link>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=21</link>
		<comments>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction
Displaced Mason type II fractures of the radial head are  often treated non-operatively. However it has been our experience that a number  of patients with these injuries have an unsatisfactory result due to a malunion  or nonunion of the radial head. The literature however does not address whether  it is worthwhile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Introduction</strong></h2>
<p>Displaced Mason type II fractures of the radial head are  often treated non-operatively. However it has been our experience that a number  of patients with these injuries have an unsatisfactory result due to a malunion  or nonunion of the radial head. The literature however does not address whether  it is worthwhile to perform an osteotomy and reduce anatomically established  non-unions or mal-unions of the radial head. Our aim was to  assess whether operative management of late presenting displaced fractures of  the radial head will improve patients pain and function.</p>
<h2>Materials and  Methods</h2>
<p>We retrospectively reviewed thirty-three consecutive  patients who presented late to the senior author’s practice between 2001 and  2008 with isolated symptomatic Mason type II fractures of the radial head.  Presentation was between 3 weeks and 10 months post injury. All patients had an  obvious malunion or established nonunion of the radial head. These patients then  underwent an osteotomy, elevation and anatomical reduction, and internal  fixation with or without bone grafting to the radial head. We then evaluated  these patients for pre and post-operative pain, elbow range of movement, and function.</p>
<h2>Results</h2>
<p>In  this series there was a statistically significant improvement of elbow range of  movement and reduction in elbow pain after the surgical procedure. All  radiographs showed established union and the deformity or step in the radial  head was improved in all cases. 2 cases required a second arthroscopic  procedure post internal fixation. All patients had improved function and were  glad they had undergone surgery.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Patients  often present late following an injury to the radial head. A non-united or  malunited articular fracture with a step or gap with a mechanical block can  cause a dilemma regarding whether there will be a benefit in operating at a  late stage. There have been no studies addressing this in the literature. Our  study suggests that osteotomy, elevation and internal fixation of late radial  head fractures can improve patients function, range of motion and decrease  their overall pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=21</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Limited Incision Plating of the Clavicle” – A new Surgical Technique David Duckworth and Nick Smith</title>
		<link>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=13</link>
		<comments>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=13#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Orthopaedic Surgery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction: Methods of internal fixation of clavicle fractures include  intramedullary devices and plate fixation. Intramedullary devices had the  advantage of a smaller incision and therefore less paraesthesia distal to the  scar. With more anatomical and less bulky plates we now have a surgical  technique enabling one to fix clavicles through a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><strong> </strong>Methods of internal fixation of clavicle fractures include  intramedullary devices and plate fixation. Intramedullary devices had the  advantage of a smaller incision and therefore less paraesthesia distal to the  scar. With more anatomical and less bulky plates we now have a surgical  technique enabling one to fix clavicles through a similar size incision. This  technique is both minimally invasive and without the complications of nailing  and previous plates.</p>
<p><strong>Methods:</strong> Over the last 6 months the authors  has fixed 35 clavicle fractures in adolescents and females using an anatomical  clavicle plate, through a small incision usually adopted for intramedullary  devices. The technique involves an incision inferior to the clavicle and about  half the size of the plate. As the plate is anatomical the clavicle can  generally be reduced onto the plate and the skin elevated on either side of the  plate. Follow up was made on all patients until union. </p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> All 35 patients went onto clinical  and radiological union within 8 weeks. All scars were between 3.5 and 4.5cm. No  significant paraesthesia was noticed. Full range of motion was achieved between  3 to 6 weeks. No plates have been removed due to irritation. Contact sports  were allowed at between 6 to 8 weeks. No complications occurred.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> That clavicle fractures  can be stabilized through a limited incision technique due to new low profile  anatomical plates. The incision is also made below the clavicle to decrease  irritation under the skin. With this new technique range of motion and function  is achieved quickly and reproducibly. This technique has also now been adopted  for more complex clavicle fracture patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=13</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operative outcome of displaced medial-end clavicle fractures in adults</title>
		<link>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=5</link>
		<comments>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clavicle Injuries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Orthopaedic Surgery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operative  outcome of displaced medial-end clavicle fractures in adults
Adrian K. Low, MBBS,  David G. Duckworth, FRACS, and Desmond J. Bokor, FRACS, Sydney, Australia
The results  following nonoperative treatment of displaced, medial end clavicle fractures is  often unsatisfactory; but no study has yet reported the outcome of operative ﬁxation  of these fractures. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operative  outcome of displaced medial-end clavicle fractures in adults</p>
<p>Adrian K. Low, MBBS,  David G. Duckworth, FRACS, and Desmond J. Bokor, FRACS, Sydney, Australia</p>
<p>The results  following nonoperative treatment of displaced, medial end clavicle fractures is  often unsatisfactory; but no study has yet reported the outcome of operative ﬁxation  of these fractures. This study reports the results of open reduction and  internal ﬁxation on displaced, medial end clavicle fractures, in ﬁve adult  patients (aged 25–52 years, mean 43) including 1 patient with a nonunion. The  mean follow-up was 3.3 years (8 months-10.3 years). All fractures had united  clinically and radiologically. No complications occurred, and no revision  surgery was required. VAS pain scores averaged 0.75 (0-2) at rest, 0.75 (0-2)  for normal activities, and 1.0 (0-2) for heavy activities. The mean DASH score  was 9.0 (0-17), and all patients were very satisﬁed with the results of surgery  (VAS 10). All patients had a full range of motion of their shoulder at ﬁnal  follow-up and were able to return to pre-injury occupational and activity  levels. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:751­754.)</p>
<p>Fractures of the medial end of  the clavicle in adults are uncommon, accounting for only 2-3% of all clavicle  fractures. Traditionally, these fractures have been treated nonoperatively,  even when signiﬁcantly dis­placed, with operative intervention reserved for  open fractures, neurovascular involvement, or threatened overlying skin. The  literature is sparse on medial end fractures, but the results of available  studies suggest that nonoperative treatment of displaced fractures is of­ten  unsatisfactory. Some have reported that up to half of all patients are still  symptomatic more than a year af­ter injury, while others have shown a nonunion rate approaching 15%. To our knowledge, no study to date has reported on the outcome  of operative inter­vention speciﬁc for displaced, medial end clavicle frac­tures.  This study reports on 5 patients who had open reduction and  internal ﬁxation (ORIF) of a displaced, medial end clavicle fracture.</p>
<div id="credits">
<p>From the Department of Orthopaedics, Australian School of</p>
<p>Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University. None of the authors  received ﬁnancial support for this study. Reprint requests: Adrian K Low, PO  Box 212, Epping, NSW 1710,</p>
<p>Australia (E-mail: <a href="mailto:adrianklow@gmail.com">adrianklow@gmail.com</a>). Copyright ª 2008 by Journal of  Shoulder and Elbow Surgery</p>
<p>Board of  Trustees. 1058-2746/2008/$34.00 doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.01.139</p></div>
<h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3>
<p>Adult patients  who had ORIF of a displaced, medial end clavicle fracture between 1997 and  2007, were included in this study. A medial end fracture was deﬁned as one  which occurred in the medial one-third of the clavicle on radio­graphs. All  were closed fractures associated with shortening and deformity. Typically, the  lateral end of the clavicle was displaced both anteriorly and slightly  superiorly, while the medial end remained within the sternoclavicular joint. Pa­tients  with an open physis on radiograph were excluded, as children and adolescents  may display different fracture patterns involving the medial growth plate.</p>
<p>A direct surgical  approach, centered on the deformity, was used to expose the fracture fragments.  The fracture was reduced and ﬁxed primarily with a medial clavicle plate and  screws in 4 cases, and stabilized in another only with a screw and sutures  because of poor bone stock (Figure 1).  Postoperatively, the extremities were immobi­lized in a sling for 2 to 4 weeks,  after which gentle motion was allowed until fracture union occurred. In the ﬁrst  2 to 4 weeks, patients were allowed to use the hand with their elbow by the  side for simple daily tasks. The patients were reviewed postoperatively at  approximately 1 and 6 weeks and then every 3 to 6 months until they were fully  functional. Radiographs were taken until union was con­ﬁrmed.</p>
<p>Assessment of  shoulder function was carried out postop­eratively. The patient’s pain proﬁle was  assessed using a vi­sual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 represented no pain and  10 the worst possible pain. They were asked to record their pain level at rest,  with normal activities (such as self-grooming, driving), and with heavy  activities (lifting ob­jects). They also rated their satisfaction with the  results of their surgery using a VAS, where 0 represented not satis­ﬁed at all  and 10 completely satisﬁed. Functional outcome was evaluated using the DASH  (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) questionnaire, which is scored  from 0-100, with a higher score representing a higher level of functional  disability. Shoulder range of motion was docu­mented and fracture union  assessed clinically and radio­graphically.</p>
<h3>RESULTS</h3>
<p>Five adult  patients were identiﬁed who had opera­tive treatment for a displaced medial end  clavicle frac­ture. All were male with a mean age of 43 (25–52) years. Three were right-hand  dominant, and in 4, the injury affected their dominant side. The cause was typ­ically  the result of a high energy injury (motorcycle 3, motor vehicle accident 1,  rugby 1), and all were iso­lated injuries. Preoperative computed tomography  (CT) scans were obtained in 2 patients to assess the amount of anterior  displacement. The 3D reconstruc­tions were able to deﬁne the deformity  accurately in these patients (Figures 1, B and 2, B).</p>
<p><a href="http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image002.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3" title="image002" src="http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image002-300x212.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="212" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Figure 1 Preoperative (A) x-ray and (B) CT scan. Postoperative (C) x-ray.</strong></p>
<p>In 4 cases, the  fracture was acute and ﬁxed within 2 weeks of the injury. One patient, however,  presented with a painful, hypertrophic nonunion 9 months after the injury. This  fracture was stabilized after taking down the hypertrophic nonunion and ﬁxing  the frac­ture with a plate, screws, and local bone graft (Fig­ure 2).</p>
<p>The mean  follow-up was 3.3 years (8 months-10.3 years). All fractures united clinically  and radiographi­cally. No complications occurred, and 1 patient had a second  surgery for voluntary hardware removal 6 months after surgery, despite being  asymptomatic. All patients had a full range of motion in the shoulder at last  review. The mean VAS pain scores were 0.75 (0-2) at rest, 0.75 (0-2) with  normal activities, and</p>
<p>1.0 (0-2) with  heavy activities. The mean DASH score was 9.0 (0-17), and all patients were  very satisﬁed with the results of surgery (mean VAS 10). All patients had  managed to return to their previous occupation and activity levels.</p>
<h3>DISCUSSION</h3>
<p>Indications for  surgery on medial end clavicle frac­tures have traditionally only included open  fractures, neurovascular involvement, or with a threat to the in­tegrity of the  overlying skin, even in the presence of signiﬁcant displacement. Unsatisfactory  results follow­ing nonoperative treatment of displaced, medial end fractures  have inﬂuenced some surgeons to include these fractures as an indication for  internal ﬁxation. However, due to the rarity of this fracture, only 1 study to  date has reported solely on medial end clavicle fractures, and none is available with results following op­erative ﬁxation.</p>
<p>Recently,  Throckmorton et al reviewed 57 medial end clavicle fractures  retrospectively in 55 patients that presented to a level 1 trauma center.  Treatment was nonoperative, except in 4 where an open frac­ture was present.  The majority was the result of high energy trauma, such as motor vehicle  accidents, and this ﬁnding was supported by our study and others. Ninety percent of their patients sustained  multisystem injuries with an associated 20% mortality rate. Medial end  fractures comprised 9.3% of all their clavicle fractures, a higher incidence  than that reported previously. This was accounted for by the higher use of CT  scans in the trauma setting, where 22% of fractures were seen only on CT scans,  but not on radiographs. CT scans can also be useful for determining the amount of  displacement, espe­cially in the coronal plane, which may not be readily seen  on chest x-rays alone (Figures 1 and  2). In their study, 44% of medial end fractures were minimally displaced (&lt;2mm), 23% had  2-10 mm, and 33% had &gt;10 mm of  displacement. Disappointingly, after a mean of 15.5 months, the majority of  patients still reported mild (25%), moderate (22%), or severe (6%) pain.</p>
<p><a href="http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image004.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4" title="image004" src="http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image004-300x238.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="238" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Figure 2 Nonunion. Preoperative (A) x-ray and (B) CT scan. Postoperative (C) x-ray.</strong></p>
<p>The nonunion rate  following nonoperative treat­ment of medial end fractures is difﬁcult to  determine, as studies have been limited by the small number of patients in  reported series. However, most studies have suggested a poorer outcome when  displaced medial end fractures are treated nonoperatively. In a prospective  series of 222 consecutive clavicle frac­tures, fracture displacement was found  to be the stron­gest radiographic risk factor for sequelae. The authors identiﬁed  4 (2%) medial end fractures, and af­ter 6 months, half of these (2 patients)  still complained of weakness and pain at rest and with activity. One patient  had a nonunion. In a prospective study of 868 consecutive clavicle fractures  treated nonopera­tively, only 24 (2.76%)  involved the medial end with the rate of nonunion higher for displaced (14.3%)  than for nondisplaced fractures (6.7%). In contrast, one study reported good  results with nonop­erative treatment. In 1000 consecutive clavicle frac­tures,  all medial end fractures (n ¼ 28, 2.8%) united  with only one requiring later surgery for a bony prom­inence. However, only 5  fractures had been consid­ered displaced. In both of these studies, the authors  concluded that fracture displacement signiﬁcantly in­creases the risk of  delayed and nonunion for diaphy­seal and lateral end clavicle fractures, but  the numbers were too small to make conclusions on me­dial end fractures.</p>
<p>The treatment of  clavicle nonunions can be chal­lenging, and the literature is sparse in this  area. In a se­ries of 20 clavicle nonunions,1 the only medial end nonunion healed after internal ﬁxation with  a lag screw and bone graft. However, the patient still com­plained of severe  pain after 32 months. In our study, the patient who had ﬁxation of a nonunion  did very well after 8 months of follow-up. He complained of no pain other than  with heavy lifting, had a full range of shoulder movement, and had returned to  full-time work. In conclusion,  although limited by the small number of cases, our study has shown that early ﬁxation  of dis­placed medial end clavicle fractures can result in ana­tomic  reconstruction of the clavicle and a favorable outcome with minimal  complications as measured us­ing VAS and DASH scores. Deformity is minimized</p>
<div id="credits">
<h3>REFERENCES</h3>
<p>1. Der Tavitian J, Davison JN, Dias  JJ. Clavicular fracture non-union sur­gical outcome and complications. Injury  2002;33:135-43.</p>
<ul>
<li>Nowak J, Holgersson  M, Larsson S. Sequelae from clavicular frac­tures are common: a prospective  study of 222 patients. Acta Orthop 2005;76:496-502.</li>
<li>Postacchini F,  Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clav­icle fractures. J Shoulder  Elbow Surg 2002;11:452-6.</li>
<li>Robinson CM.  Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classiﬁcation. J Bone  Joint Surg Br 1998;80:476-84.</li>
<li>Robinson CM,  Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakeﬁeld AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion  following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am  2004;86-A:1359-65.</li>
<li>Throckmorton T,  Kuhn JE. Fractures of the medial end of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg  2007;16:49-54.</li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drdavidduckworth.com.au/orthopaedic-blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
